Let’s clear something up right away.

Every time a school levy shows up on the ballot, voters are told the same thing:

“Schools are underfunded.”

But almost nobody explains how Montana’s school funding system actually got here — or why communities are repeatedly asked to raise their own property taxes to keep schools running.

So here’s the timeline they rarely lay out plainly.


1949 — The First Statewide School Funding System

In 1949, Montana created what was called the Foundation Program.

The idea was simple: the state would create a basic funding system so schools across Montana had some level of financial stability.

Before that, districts were largely on their own.


1988–1989 — The Courts Step In

By the late 1980s, huge funding differences had developed between wealthy districts and poorer rural districts.

The Montana Supreme Court ruled the system unconstitutional because it created major inequalities in school funding across the state.

The Legislature responded by trying to “equalize” funding between districts.

But the fix didn’t last.


1993 — The System We Still Use Today

In 1993, the Montana Legislature passed House Bill 667, which created the funding structure still used today.

This is where the terms BASE budget and MAX budget come from.

Under this system:

• The BASE budget is the minimum level of funding the state formula provides.
• The MAX budget is the highest amount a district can spend without special voter approval.

Anything above BASE often requires local property tax levies approved by voters.

That’s why levies appear so often on local ballots.


2004 — The Courts Step In Again

The system ran into trouble again in the case Columbia Falls Elementary School District No. 6 v. State.

The Montana Supreme Court ruled that the state was not adequately funding schools and that the system failed to meet the constitutional requirement for a “quality education.”


2005 — The Legislature Rewrites the Formula

In response, lawmakers revised the funding formula and attempted to define what “quality education” means under Montana law.

But the core structure — BASE budgets, MAX budgets, and local levies — remained in place.


Today — The Same System, Different Ballots

Here’s the key point many voters don’t realize.

Montana schools still operate under the same fundamental structure created in 1993.

Yes, adjustments have been made.

But the backbone of the system is still:

• state formula funding
• property taxes
• voter-approved levies

Which means every few years, communities are asked again to decide whether to raise their own property taxes to support their schools.


Why This Matters

School funding debates in Montana are rarely simple.

They involve:

• state law
• court rulings
• property taxes
• local priorities
• and decades of legislative decisions.

But understanding the structure matters.

Because once you understand how the system works, you start to see why these funding questions keep coming back to voters.

And why every election cycle seems to bring another levy.


What Comes Next

If we’re going to have an honest conversation about school funding in northwest Montana, we need more than slogans and campaign flyers.

We need the facts.

That’s why the next step in this series should dig deeper into two critical questions:

1. How many levy attempts have actually occurred in northwest Montana districts over the last 10–20 years?

And

2. What does the full levy history look like county by county?

Specifically in:

• Lincoln County
• Flathead County
• Sanders County
• Lake County

Because once voters see the full timeline — the votes, the amounts, the frequency — the conversation about school funding becomes a lot clearer.

And a lot more honest.

This is a family friendly website. Our spam filters automatically trash anything with inappropriate language. If you find your comments never show up, please review your username/email for anything that might be being caught in our spam filter.

Leave a Reply

Trending

Discover more from Trego's Mountain Ear

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading